Annexation of Crimea





Annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 –2016, (denoted also with terms Russian occupation of Crimea and Аннексия Крыма) is observed since 2014.02.20, that can be considered as the beginning of the Russian invasion into Ukraine, and as part of the Putin world war

Claims
The Russian administration, following Vladimir Putin, insist, that the annexation corresponds to the historical prudence and necessary for the reunion of Russian nations. Several authors suggest historical maps that indicate, that this claim is not consistent.

The Western administration qualify the annexation as aggression, military invasion, that violates several international laws and agreements .

Decision of administration of civilised countries not to recognise the annexation of Crimea as change of its legal status is specified in the resolution of General Assembly of the United Nations from 2014.03.27. .

According the the decision and the corresponding status, all Russian soldiers who visit the "annexed" Crimea without permission of the Ukrainian government (this is typical case) are qualified as terrorists and military crimes, according to definition of these terms.

Time and place
Occupation of Crimea by Russian troops begun in February 2014, at the moment, when the Ukrainian administration suffered strong reformation, and Ukrainian military forces failed to stop the aggressors.

It is believed, that Vladimir Putin and Vladislav Surkov had sent to Ukraine terrorists and handled them in the seising of the state building and neutralising the attempts of the border guards to stop the invasion.

Russian troops who performed the occupation did not were indications, to which army do they belong. Therefore, they are qualified as terrorists. Some links about this are collected in the article Designate Russia as state sponsor of terrorism.

In order to justify the annexation, the Russian terrorists had organised the occupendum, that is considered as imitation of referendum, about status of Crimea. The illegal character of the organization, the tricky formulation of questions and the Churov's style of counting of ballots (see article Election fraud) require to create the special term occupendum for the event. Similar occupendums took place at the territories of Donbass, occupied by the Russian terrorists.

Goals
The main goals of annexation of Crimea (2014-) seem to the same as those of the other components of the Putin world war, that includes also the Russian invasion into Georgia (2008-) and the Russian invasion into Syria (2015-):

1. Making problems for the construction of new paperiness into Europe bypassing Russia, in other to keep monopoly for export of oil and natural gas into Europe. Thus goal, at least until year 2016, seem so be achieved.

2. Money laundering from the Russian budget with pretext of "help" to the people at the territories occupied by Russia. This goal, least until year 2016, seem so be achieved: the strong inflation of the Russian currency is observed, the price of rouble in 2014–2015 drops a half of its price, roughly, from 3 USA cents to 1.5 USA cents. Similar and even stronger drop of price of the Russian immobility and companies is observed; roughly, the half of treasures of the Russian people is plundered, monetarized and hidden in the of of-shores of the top of the Russian administration. Some of these of-shores are reported, see Panama Papers.

3. Plundering or properties at the occupied territories and the distribution among friends of organisers of the Putin world war; many people flee from the occupied territories, leaving their homes, gardens and business to the occupants.

4. Distraction of the public in Russia from the election fraud, money laundering and plundering of business, performed by the corrupted Russian officials.

5. Training of the army, that may be requested for suppression of protests to avoid the Revolution.

Pretext
As the case of the Russian invasion into Georgia, the goal of the annexation of Crimea is declared to be protection of the Russian people at the plundered territories.

In order to support this goal in the propaganda, the occupendum among the population of Cirmea is organised in 2014, March. The main population of Crimea, Crimean tatars, just ignored that spectacle.

Historic analogies
Annexation of Crimea by Putin's Russia in 2014 is compared to the annexation of Austria and Sudetenland by Hitler's Germany in 1938. Such a comparison har expressed Hillary Clinton .

Analogies between events of the beginning of the World War 2 and the Russian innovation into Ukraine are amalysed also by the historic Andrew Zubov .

The analogy with the nazi Germanu becomes deeper with the news about firing of Andrey Zubov for his critical opinion about the Russian annexation of Crimea .

As in the case of Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Putin distribute awards to the soldiers, who took part in the Russian invasion into Ukraine and the "return" of Crimea. This makes the analogy of Putin's Russia and the nazi Germany even stronger. More links about this analogy are collected in articles Putin and Hitler and Putin world war.

Up to year 2015, the attempts to stop Putin do not look efficient; at least for beginning of year 2015, the expansion of Russian troops to the continental part of Ukraine continues.

Sanctions
The top of the personals, involved in the Russian invasion into Ukraine and, in particular, in the annexation of Crimea are objects of international sanctions.

Any collaboration with the occupational administration and even a visit to the occupied territories ca be qualified as unauthorised cross of the bords of Ukraine and lead to the legal persecution.

European parliament
2016.02.02, the position by the European Parliament with respect to Russian annexation of Crimea is formulated.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0182&format=XML&language=EN MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION. PDF 266k DOC 67k See also joint motion for a resolution 	RC-B8-0173/2016 2.2.2016// PE576.543v01-00 B8-0182/2016 with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 135 of the Rules of Procedure

on the situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars (2016/2556(RSP))

Charles Tannock, Mark Demesmaeker, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Ryszard Czarnecki, Geoffrey Van Orden, Karol Karski, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Angel Dzhambazki, Jana Žitňanská, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Arne Gericke, Monica Macovei on behalf of the ECR Group NB: This motion for a resolution is available in the original language only.

European Parliament resolution on the situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars (2016/2556(RSP)) B8‑0182/2016 The European Parliament,

- having regard to its previous resolutions on the Eastern Partnership (EaP), Ukraine, and the Russian Federation,

- having regard to the European Council decision (21 March, 27 June, 16 July 2014) imposing sanctions on the Russian Federation as a follow-up to the illegal annexation of Crimea,

- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 11 June 2015 on the strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia,

- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2016 on Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine,

- having regard to the Reports of the Human Rights Assessment Mission on Crimea conducted by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities (HCNM),

- having regard to the Human Rights Watch World Report 2016 published on 27th January 2016,

A. Whereas the Russian Federation has illegally annexed Crimea, and therefore violated international law including the UN Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum;

B. Whereas during the illegal annexation of Crimea Russia allegedly deployed troops of the Black Sea fleet against the Crimean Tatars, Ukrainians as well as the Ukrainian soldiers, who displayed courage and loyalty to Ukraine and peacefully opposed the belligerent act of annexation;

C. Whereas the Crimean Tatar leaders, such as Mustafa Dzhemilev and Refat Chubarov, were from the outset banned from entering into Crimea and now a Russian court has issued an arrest warrant for Dzhemilev, who earlier spend 15 years in Soviet prisons for his efforts to allow his nation to return to their native land in Crimea;

D. Whereas the human rights situation in Crimea, an particularly of Crimean Tatars has dramatically deteriorated, while the Crimean Tatar intellectuals, journalists and ordinary citizens who disagree with Russian authorities regularly disappear and are found dead with signs of torture;

E. Whereas Russian authorities put on trial and still hold as prisoners Akhtem Chyihoz, Ali Asanov and Mustafa Dehermendzhi, who on February 26, 2014 took part in peaceful rally in front of local parliament of Crimea in defence of their fatherland against Russian occupying troops.

F. Whereas the Ukrainian language has been removed from the public sphere, often through use of force; whereas Christian churches independent of Moscow have seen restrictions put on their activities;

G. Whereas on 12 November, 2015, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted a resolution in which it recognized the deportation of the Crimean Tatars in 1944 as genocide;

H. Whereas Ukraine seeks to start talks about de-occupation of Crimea in the Geneva plus format including EU and states that signed the Budapest Memorandum: Ukraine, Russia, United States, and the United Kingdom; whereas Russia refused to hold any talks on returning Crimea to Ukraine;

I. Whereas Russia refused to sign new energy supply contract with Kiev in protest against wording implying that Crimea is part of Ukraine; whereas Russia declared state of emergency in Crimea; whereas Russia in opposition to inter alia DCFTA EU-Ukraine imposed trade restrictions against Ukraine, including ban on food imports;

1.  condemns systemic violation by the Russian occupation authorities of the fundamental rights and liberties of local population, particularly targeting the Crimean Tatars and ethnic Ukrainians, including numerous and continuous cases of murders, tortures and intimidations;

2.  condemns biased and selective criminal prosecutions against Crimean Tatar and pro-Ukrainian activists and organisations, including leaders of Crimean Tatar people Mustafa Dzhemilev and Refat Chubarov;

3.  calls the Russian authorities to immediately release from illegal imprisonment Oleg Sentsov, Nadia Savchenko, who are kept in Russia as political prisoners, as well as all other Ukrainian citizens illegally detained in Russia and at the territory of the illegally annexed Crimea, including citizens of Crimea Tatar ethnicity including Akhtem Chyihoz, Ali Asanov and Mustafa Dehermendzhi;

4.  condemns militarisation of the Crimean peninsula and Russia's threats to deploy nuclear weapons in Crimea, which constitutes significant threat to the regional, European and global security;

5.  calls Russia to withdraw of all its forces from Ukraine including eastern Ukraine as well as Crimea, including the Black Sea fleet troops, which allegedly took part in the illegal annexation of Crimea.

6.  calls the Council to elaborate the next set of sanctions against Russia regarding its illegal annexation of Crimea, since Russia refuses to stop violation of human rights in Crimea and the militarisation of the peninsula;

7. calls the Council and the EEAS to strengthen pressure on Russia to allow access of international organisations to Crimea for monitoring human rights situation in view of the ongoing gross violations of fundamental freedoms and human rights in the peninsula, establishing permanent international monitoring and conventional mechanisms; to stress that any international presence on the ground should to be coordinated with Ukraine and include the leading role of the Council of Europe's Commissioner for Human Rights;

8.  Calls for better access for international human rights monitoring organisations to all cases of serious human rights abuses in Crimea; calls on the Ukrainian Government to use all means at its disposal to investigate and prosecute war crimes committed on its territory; calls on the international community, including the Hague Tribunal, to commence an investigation into the potential crimes committed during the illegal annexation of Crimea and afterwards; 9.  supports initiative of Ukraine to establish international negotiation mechanism on reestablishment of Ukrainian sovereignty over Crimea in the “Geneva plus” format;

10.  calls Russia to start negotiations with Ukraine and other parties on de-occupation of Crimea, lifting trade and energy embargos and to recall state of emergency in Crimea;

11.  welcomes recent declarations of Turkey on Ukraine and Crimea, which are more consistent with the positions of Member States, EU and NATO;

12.  instructs President to forward this resolution to to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Member States, the President of Ukraine, the governments and parliaments of the Eastern Partnership countries and of the Russian Federation, and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Gallery
360px



Keywords
Aggression, Budapest memorandum, Designate Russia as state sponsor of terrorism, Fascism, KGB, Putin and Hitler, Putin world war, Russia, Russian invasion into Ukraine, Stop Putin, Terror