2016.03.19.Crash

200px|right 4208637.jpg NoPlaneRt1.jpg 2016.03.19crashNoPlane2.jpg 2016.03.19crashNoPlane3.jpg

2016.03.19.Crash (2016.03.19.катастрофа) is reported to happen at the Rostov around 00:03am at the Rostov (Rostov–na–donu) airport.

The passenger jet Boeing-737-800 of air company Flydubai, performing flight FZ981 arrived from Dubai is reported to smash into the landing strip, killing 62: all the passengers and the crew.

In the first communications the Russian officials claim that the pilots failed to land at the first attempt around 1am, then waited for 2 hours making turns above Rostov and crashed around 3am the airplane at the second landing attempt. The cause of the crash is reported to be bad weather, that caused the plane to touch the landing airstrip with its wing and to destruct. Poor quality video is supplied, that seems to be done from some commercial center outside the airport. .

However, this statement contradicts the video supplied .

That video shows, that luminous object quickly approaches the ground by steep trajectory; if that object is airplane, then, it seems to be already burning and, perhaps, partially decomposed.

The apparent inconsistency of the Russian official reports on the cash makes the case subject of scientific interest and causes wide discussion of the topic.

Hypotheses
Many authors interpret this contradiction as indication on sabotage of the ground service staff and that workers ministry MHS (Министерство по чрезвычайным ситуациам). Thoese suspicions become even stronger after the morning's video, that shows the airstrip, that is reported to place of fall of the airplane. at that video, neither wreckage of the airplane (that is expected to be there, if the crash is result of the landing error, touching of the ground by the wing), nor crater, that is supposed to be there at the steep smash of the airplane at high speed.

The main official hypothesis can be summarised as follows:

(0) 2016.03.19.Accident with many causalities is result of poor weather, errors of pilots and/or some technical failure in the airplane; no sabotage takes places, and the officials who deal with the catastrophe show their good will to investigate the case and to inform the society about results of their investigation.

The hypothesis (0) above looks completely inconsistent. The observed publications can be explained within any of the following two hypothesis:

(1). 2016.03.19.Terroristic act. The airplane had been completely destroyed for the small pieces at high altitude by explosion of very heavy bomb.

(2). 2016.03.19.Stolen airplane The airplane had been just stolen, perhaps, in the plot with some of passengers, who want to escape and do not want anybody to search for them; in this case, the crash is just show, legend, inspiration for public.

Each of the hypothesis (1),(2) implies the sabotage of both, the ground service of the airport and the officials who investigate the case. Hypothesis of this sabotage appears to be in good agreement with more general concept about total corruption at all levels of the Russian administration.

Up to 2016.03.24, there are no evidences, that would allow to choose among the last two hypothesis, while the hypothesis (0) contradicts the observed publications.

2016.03.19.Accident
Hypothesis (0) is denoted here 2016.03.19.Accident.

Videos show neither wreckage of the crashed airplane, nor even big fragments of the airplane body .

The deep crater had been expected to be caused by the explosion shown in the first movie.

However, no such a crater appear in the videos made after the sunrise.

In the special video, Sergei Zaiko (Зайко Сергей Владимирович), representative of MAK (МАК, Межгосударственный Авиационный Коммитет) claims, that the fragments of the crashed Boeing are collected in the special hangar. But the video does not show the wreckage constructed from the fragments, no one seconds. Instead, during several minutes, the video demonstrates the emergency registrators, that do not seem to provide any significant information about the crash. .

The concept does not explain the absence of records of the on-board cameos, that were supposed to translate the video of the flight in real time to the computers in the airport and other ground service systems. These videorecords are not ever discussed by the officials. The correspondents either do not ask about this strange phenomenon, or the questions and answers are carefully censored-out from the interviews published.

In addition the hypothesis about good will of the officials, who deal with the catastrophe, does not agree with the general concept about total corruption of the Russian administration.

2016.03.19.Terroristic act
The in-flight destruction of the aircraft to the small pieces, distributed over a huge area, could be caused by explosion of a heavy bomb on board, or by direct hit of the aircraft by some missile of class buk, already reported to be efficient shutting-down the passenger jets. The fire on board, caused by the in–flight destruction, could appear as bright spot in the video.

The rest of fuel still contained in the biggest pieces, could disperse them too at the explosion at the moment of touching the ground. As these pieces were not heavy, they caused no crater at the airstrip.

The goal of the terrorists could be the same, as in the case of Katyn-2 and catastrophe of MH-17; the pirates picked–up not only cash from passengers and crew, but also jewelry, children toys, cosmetics and even the bank cards; in the case of Katyn-2, four of them were caught on this.

Motivation of the administrators, to seem to cover the terroristic attack, may be destruction of attention of the people from the show-trial on Nadiya Savchenko, the Ukrainian hostage captured by the terrorists at the Russian invasion into Ukraine.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky indicates, that his terroristic group is highly interested to organise terroristic acts in order to kill as many civilian people as possible. .

2016.03.19.Stolen airplane
Several authors doubt in video .

The video is of poor quality, and it is recorded by a camera that is far from the airstrip. The bright spot and the explosion could be just firework, imitating the crash, and also result of montage of video from the camera and a computer-drawn burst.

The two hours of waiting reported could be also fake. In the case of murdering of Yury Gagarin and Vladimir Seregin (1968.03.27), the ground radar is reported to "see" their airplane during some ten minutes after the crash.

In the case Catyn-2, 2010.04.10, during a week, the dispatchers claimed, that they saw the airplane on radars, making 4 landing attempts, until 9:56 local time (or even later); then, the moment of crash had been changed to 9:41; accordingly, and the number of landing attempts had been reducer to unity. Perhaps, the signal a the radar had been emulated by the KGB ariplane Il–76. In the similar case, in order to let the robbers to drive the stollen boeing as far as possible, its signal at the radar cold be emulated by another airplane.

Concept about stollen airplane shows good agreement with absence of the high–quality records of the catastrophe.

The records of the on-board cameras of video monitoring, that were supposed to transfer the image to the ground–based servers, do not appear in the internet, and the officials avoid even to mention them.

The similar absence of the video records is observed in other cases too. The details of events 2015.02.27, when Putin killed Nemtsov, are supposed to be registered with high resolution by cameras placed on the Kremlin wall and those at the Nemtsov bridge. These videorecodrs seem to be stollen by terrorists, perhaps, the same who had organised the murder. Again, the Russian officials cannot explain why these records are not available. Absence of the videodecords by the on-board cameras of monitoring from the on-ground servers indicates, that the crime is covered at the highest level of the Russian administration. Absence of these records seem to be one of the key questions about the case, and the officials carefully avoid the consideration; they discuss the on–board recorders instead; and these recodrers are shown to provide no information about the cause of the accident.

Hypothesis about stollen airplane shows good agreement with more general concept, that in century 21, corruption in Russia not only get wide scale, but becomes common, usual phenomenon, that characterises the life of the Russian officials.

Many authors are sure that the Boeing had been stolen, аnd actually the only imitation of catastrophe took place.

More publications
The high–quality pictures about the crash are suggested by Dayly mail .

Up to March 26, there is no evidence that would allow to completely exclude, refute any of the concepts above of the 2016.03.19.Crash.

Keywords
Corruption, Designate Russia as state sponsor of terrorism