Katyn-2



'Katyn-2 (Katyn2010, Катынь-2) is crash of the Polish presidential airplane Tu-154M, board number 101, that happened 2010.04.10 in a kilometer East from the "Severnyj" (Северный) airport, Smolensk.

In that catastrophe, of order of 96 people (all the passengers and the crew) were dead, the body of the airplane was disintegrated for many parts, the records of the ground monitoring of the flight and as well as the records of the on-board emergency recorders of parameters of flight remain secret. The secrecy of the records and the inconsistency of the statements by the Russian representatives caused doubts in the Russian official version. Many people around the world think that the catastrophe was result of the terroristic act organized by the Russian KGB (ФСБ]], ФСО) and approved by Vladimir Putin.

Official version
The official version of the catastrophe does not match the only available transcript of the conversation of pilots with the dispatcher and contradicts other statements of the Russian representatives.

During a year since the catastrophe, the official version did not become more clear; the records of the ground monitoring or the parameters of the flight remain secret ant perhaps, never will be transferred to the Polish representatives. Sergei Ivanav had declared, that one already can understand everything about this catastrophe. The key questions about the crash were not answered by the Russian officials.

The failure of the investigation is often considered as indication, that the catastrophe was planned and realized by the same officials who pretend to investigate it. The Polish protesters consider Donald Tusk as a betrayer and qualify Vladimir Putin as Murderer. .

Katyn-1 and Katyn-2
The etymology of the term "Katyn-r" refers to the events of the time of the beginning of the World War 2. There is analogy between the catastrophe 2010 April 10 and the mass murderers of the Polish officers at Katyn, near the Smolensk, at the year 1940. Therefore the catastrophe 2010 April 10 is called "Katyn–2". The mass murdereds of 1040, then, get the name Katyn-1.

In the case of Katyn-1, the Moscow's politicians also during a long time denied their involvement on the crime, and used to keep the documents about that murders in deep secret. . At Katyn-2, as in 2040, the Polish people also lost the best representatives .

Гипотеза о причастности к катастрофе российских спецслужб появилась сразу после катастрофы

The hypothesis about involvement of the Russian secret police (KGB) appeared after the catastrophe and soon got confirmations . It was revealed, that the estimates of the moment of the crash, as well as the number of the landing attempts, suggested by the representatives of the Russian federation, contradict each other. The hypothesis of the involvement of KGB agrees with the delays with publication of the transcription of the conversation of the pilots with the dispatcher and with the observation that the original records remain in secret. This hypothesis agrees also with the news about trophies that the KGB's marauders got soon after the crash ; the robbery could be an additional motivation of the terrorists. The concept of Katyn-2 as a terroristic act is also confirmed by the multiple claims that after the 3 aborted landing attempts, the pilots still tried to land the airplane to the same airstrip . Later, such accusation stopped to appear (the soviet veterans agreed on the version with the single landing attempts), but neither explanations nor excuses for the false accusations had appeared in the publications. The official reconstructions of the trajectory of the airplane also did not appear; the visualizations published earlier contradict to the report . Sergei Ivanov told, that no more materials on the catastrophe will be given to the Polish side. . The hiding of the records of the ground monitoring of the flight and the trajectory agree with the concept that the Russian officials do not want to reveal the important details of the catastrophe.

Until 2010 Jume 15, various estimates of the number of victims appear. In particular, Rinat Nakipov thinks, that there were 97 victims, not 96, as in the official version. . The publications that claim that the pilots were responsible for the crash, do not mention and do not discuss the variety of the estimates of the moment of crash, those of the number of aborted landing attempts, nor that of the number of victims.

Mutual contradictions of the reports about the catastrophe
Until year 2011, it is not known, what happened with the Polish passenger jet Tu-154M, flight 101, crashed 2010 Patil 10 in Smolensk. The reports contradict each other.

The moment of crash is not known
The estimate 10:00 (Moscow time 11:00) was suggest by Georgy Trushin (Георгий Трушин), Sergey Turchenki (Сергей Турченко), and Alexandr Kotserupa (Александр Коцеруба)

The estimate 9:58 is suggested by Globalist

The estimate 9:56 (Moscow time 10:56) is suggested by Irina Adrianova (Ирина Андрианова), ministry of GROB (ГРОБ). .

The estimate 9:50 (Moscow time 10:50) is suggested by Alexandr Aleshin (Александр Алёшин), head of the Russian Airforces .

The estimate 9:41 is suggest in the official report of the head of the MAK Tatiana Anodina (Татьяны Анодиной).

Number of aborted landing attempts
4 landing attempts. By the first versions, the airplane crashed at the fourth landing attepmt .

3-4 landing attempts. Press secretary of the Governor of the Smolensk region Andrey Evsenkov (Андрей Евсеенков) told that there were 3-4 landing attempts .

3 landing attempts. Georgy Bursov (Георгий Бурсов) reports, that the airplane has approached the landing 3 times, and 3 times the dispatchers indicated the deviation from the course for 150 meter.

2 landing attempts. Head of GROB (ГРОБ) minister Sergey Shoigu (Сергей Шойгу) indicates that the airplane crashed at the second attempt to land

. This estimate is also confirmed by the investigator of the Polish procurator Sbignew Jepa , negating the report of the dispatcher of the Smolnsk Airport "Severny" Anatoli Muraviev (Анатолий Муравьев), that there was the only single landing attempt .

1 landing attempt. Later, the head of MAK Tatiana Anodina (Татьяна Анохина) also had declared that there was the only single landing attempt. . For year 2011, this estimate seems to be the most accepted by the Russian officials.

Altitude of the destruction of the airplane
The dispatcher used to confirm that the airplane follows the glissade , so, one may guess that the destruction happened at the altitude of 100 meter or higher. Such an estimate agrees with the opinion by Trushin Turchenko and Kotsurupa

and corresponds to the report that all the passengers and crew were killed and the airplane is scratched for many parts, dispersed by the area of size of order of half-kilometer. .

On the other hand, the official version claims that the airplane begun to disintegrate due to the collisions with trees , and it is difficult to believe in the occasional collision with trees at the altitude of a hindered meter.

Reasons for going below the glissade
Since 2010 April, the Russian mass media promote the version that the crash was caused by the poor visibility and errors of the pilots .

The hypothesis that the pilots were told wrong air pressure at the level of the airport is suggested by Alexej Ashidmin (Алексей Ашихмин). .

Sabotage of the ground service
Alexei shumikhin (Алексей Ашихман) suggests, that the pilots were reported wrong data about the pressure in the airport, and the ground navigation lights were out of order .

The official version does not explain, why the ground service did not know that the barometers and the landing lights are out of order, why they did not know, how many landing attempts did the pilots before the crash, when the airplane disappeared from the screen of the radar, and how after to loss a wing the passenger jet could fly a half-km and climb up the altitude of order of a hundred meters to smash into many small ieces... . Such a hypothesis is so phantastic, as

the claim of Stalin that in 1940, the Polish officers fled through Manchuria .

Elimination of the political opponent
The bolwhevicks and the soviet veterans consider terror as an acceptable instrument of politics ; so, the hypothesis that the crash of the Polish airplane was caused by the KGB agents sounds reasonable. This hypothesis was widely discussed in blogs and then confirmed by the inconsistencies of the official version and hiding of the information by the Russian officials .

Writer Victor Suvorov indicates that the behavior of the official Russian representatives means that they take the responsibility for this catastrophe : the Russian agents brought all the emergency recorders and bodies of the victims into Moscow, instead of to incite the international observers to perform the investigation.

More concepts
The Russian representatives did not try to consider, discuss the origin of the misinformation in the statements of the Russian officials. This makes difficult to believe that such misinformation was admitted without a bad will .

The inconstancy of the official version and the secrecy of the information about the trajectory of the airplane leave wide field for various concepts of the crash. On the base of the published data, it is difficult to exclude the sabotage of the airport service, the involvement of the military Il-76 that used to fly in vicinity .

An example of a self-consistent concept of the crash is suggested below.

Zero landing attempts
The trees destroyed along the trace of an airplane are considered as an evidence of the errors of the pilots. But the huge amount of the trees shown causes doubts in this version: it is difficult to keep an aircraft in vicinity of the surface even intentionally; and the amount of the trees shown in the reports indicates that perhaps, they were cutter either below the crash, or soon after. No expertise of the character of cuts was presented.

The pilots of the Polish airplane could found the wrong value of the air–pressure reported from the airport, by the meaconing of the signals of the global positioning systems (the military airport is supposed to be equipped with a meaconing devices), and detect the artificial smog. The Il-76 mentioned in the reports . That Il-76 could drop tens tons of water on the way of the Polish airplane; also, some airplanes of such a class are equipped with a water–tank and/or a tail-gun.

The pilots of Tu-154M could see the peculiarities in the indications of the devices and invite the specialists from the passengers in order to confirm the failure. The airplane could be really high, when the TAWS system, confused by the meaconing, indicated the land ahead.

Such a concept explains why the pilots could ignore the TAWS signal: they knew that they still have a hundred meters of altitude, and, perhaps, even saw the ground. This concept explains the sudden drop of the altitude of the Tu–154: after to be shouted from the rear gun of the Il-76, the pilots of Tu-154 could drop the machine down, to land before the airstrip, while the airplane keeps some ability to fly; however, they could do nothing after to loss the wing, they just felt down. This concept explains the total destruction of the airplane seen at the photo. This concept explains why the lost win was found a half–kilometer away from other pieces of the airplane. This concept explains why the information about that Il-76 is not released: the water–tank and the tail–gun of the Il-76 would not add popularity to the Russian prime-minister. This concept explains why the recorders of the ground monitoring of the flight were not published: their release would reveal the falsification..

The fire at the Russian air-bases in the summer of 2010 could be arranged to destroy, to hide the Il-76 used by the terrorists. In such a way, this concept also explains why the Russian officials tried to keep that fire in secret.

Crash of Gagarin and Seregin
There is analogy between the catastrophe Katyn-2 and the catastrophe 1968 March 27 of the airplane UTI MgG-15, then the pilots Yuri Gagarin (Юрий Гагарин) and Vladimir Seregin (Владимир Серегин) were killed. Their airplane also was lost by the ground radars; the dispatchers continued to "see" it during 12 minutes after the crash. The records of the parameters of that flight also were not published. (It was declared that the ground system was out of order; the on–board recorder was declared ot be absent.). In the similar way, the reports of other pilot used to fly in fissility were not released . If the both catastrophes were planned by the same KGB, the analogy indicates the specific style: the records of the parameters of the flight are hidden, the data are kept insecret.

Tasks of the investigation
Up to year 2011, it is not known, who had organized the wide company of misinformation in the Russian mass media. Therefore, it is natural to suspect the ruling party of the country. The misinformers seem to make some errors, and they had to change the concept, and they did not have time to elaborate the new concept. In particular, they failed to make an agreement, how many landing attempts they attribute to the killed pilots, and what time do they indicate as moment of crash. The investigation should reveal the sources of information of the Russian officials who used to declare so conflicting estimates.

Among the politicians, who used to spread the inconsistent information about the catastrophe, many last names begin with An (Ан*): Andrianova (Андрианова), Anisimov (Анисимов), Anodina (Анодина), Antipov (Антипов). Perhaps, this is just an occasion. Not all of the persons involved have such last name. The name Aleshin (Алешин), who claims that the pilots got many indications to leave for the emergency landing, begins not with "An" (Ан), but with "Al" (Ал); as for the governor of Smolennsk Antufiev (Антуфьев) he did not share his information.

The new and new inconsistencies in the official version are revealed . Many people hope for the international investigation .

The Russian officials denied the request to transfer to the Polish representative the material evidences related to the catastrophe. The Polish people are upset with such an attitude and consider Donald Tusk as betrayer, while Vladimir Putin is qualified as murder. Thousands of protesters support such a qualification in Warshaw in 2011 April 9 and 10 .

The qualification of Vladimir Putin as terrorist agrees with the observations from year 2009. That time, the party "United Russia" ("Edro", or "Единая Россия") handled by Putin, submitted the notification about meetings dedicated to the Nevsky Express bombing in few days before that bombing.

Polish report
The official Russian investigation does not answer the main questions about the catastrophe. Then, in 2011 November, the so-called Cooperation of experts in support of the Association of Families of Smolensk Plane Crash „Katyn2010″ (see also the Katyn2010 association) has been prepared the document entitled Crash of the Polish Governmental Plane PFL 101 in Smolensk1 April 10, 2010 Status Report, Dated November 11, 2011 .

Summary
https://niezalezna.pl/data/TECHNICAL_REPORT.pdf

THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND

COMMITTEE FOR THE RE-INVESTIGATION OF THE SMOLENSK AIR CRASH

TECHNICAL REPORT

Facts regarding the crash of the TU-154M No. 101, (Fight PLF101), that took place in Smolensk, Russia on the 10th of April 2010 SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIONS (included in the report). 1. Post explosive destruction on the wing and pieces. a) Post explosive curls of more than one turn. b) Deformation of pieces due to high internal pressure. c) Dispersion of many pieces in all possible directions with reference to the direction of flight (also to the back and sides). d) Identification of the internal parts of the wing hanging on treetops. e. Destruction of slats and parts of the nose of the detachable part of the wing, pointing to internal pressure. 2. No traces of hitting a terrain obstacle on the leading edge of the wing. 3. Experiments conducted by the Committee confirm the possibility of the wing being cut with an explosive material and causing damages analogical to that observed in the case of the destruction of the TU-154M wing. The explosion of the central wing box (pic37) was the main reason for the destruction of TU-154M before hitting the ground. The explosion, which happened in that place, destroyed the box, leading to fragmention of the left center wing, together with the front spar and soothed ribs. The spar flew 70m west. The third spar was destroyed as well. The explosion destroyed salon 3 killing all passengers inside and throwing the body parts over the entire crash site and in the area before the fuselage had made ground contact. At the same time the explosion wave blew out the left passenger door ramming it 1 meter into the ground and blew out thousands of pieces of the galley, which were scattered over 1/3 of the crash site. The explosion wave heading to the tail destroyed this part of the center wing and curled the left and right side of the aircraft outwards with the roof to the outside. 1. Numerous pieces are soothed and burned and spread over 100m before the plane hit the ground. 2. The aircraft hitting at a shallow angle disintegrated into tens of thousands of pieces 3 No crater from a 76ton plane hitting soft soil sliding up to 150m can be seen on the crash site. 4. A total destruction of all seats. The armrest, frame, and seating are disintegrated. 5. The internal part of the aircraft is completely without floor panels and insulation. The left passenger door was rammed 1m in to the ground with a speed 10x the speed of the aircraft (12m/s), i.e. its vertical kinetic energy was increased by 100 xs. 7. The sides of the central part of the fuselage right above the place of explosion are curled outwards. 8. The destruction of the galley, being close to the epicenter, was scattered in small fragments over an area of 1300m2. 9. Characteristic body damage: a) Total defragmentation of dozens of bodies sitting in the salons near the center(s) of explosion and their dispersion over the entire crash site. b) Small body pieces at the beginning of the crash site (1/3 of entire crash site) before the fuselage made contact with the ground. c) Numerous large burn-injuries of bodies found outside of the fire zones. d) Clothes were completely or nearly completely torn off a large number of the bodies (35). 10. Identification done by CLKP experts in the fall of 2010 concerning a massive presence of traces of explosive materials, especially present on the seats.

Attempts to reinvestigate the case
Concept that Lech Kaczynski and other Polish officials are killed by the KGB agents intentionally, is scientific fact: no other reasonable explanation of appearance of the observed publications is suggested. However, before to cause serious action with respect to organisers of that crime, the scientific evidence needs to be converted into legal, juridical format.

The official investigation of the case is reported to be re-iniciated in 2016. In particular, the remains of the victims are expected to be exhumed. .

2016.11.09, Dorota Kania confirms evidences of sabotage of the Russian officials, who pretended to investigate the case. .

2017.06.01, Radio Poland indicates, that Deputy Prosecutor General Marek Pasionek indicates, that parts of two bodies found in late Polish president's coffin.

Unnumbered links
2010.04.12. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/11/AR2010041100863.html Edward Cody. Poland mourns Lech Kaczynski, father of a new nationalism. Washington Post, Monday, April 12, 2010

2010.04.28. https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/category/poland/page/2/ Pilot warned he was to close to the ground by GPWS system. April 28, 2010. .. a huge Russian military transport plane, an IL-76, could have been flying in front of the Tupolev and forced the plane to fly lower to avoid a collision. Air turbulence from the IL-76 plane would have pushed the Tupolev even lower and into a collision with the trees. // There is a fifteen minute gap between when the Tupolev plane actually crashed and when the plane crashed according to official accounts.

2011.01.13. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12184955 Kaczynski air crash: Russian report 'incomplete'. 13 January 2011.

2011. http://www.mak.ru/russian/investigations/2010/files/tu154m_101/finalreport_eng.pdf INTERSTATE AVIATION COMMITTEE AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION COMMISSION. FINAL REPORT. (English version)

2011. http://www.mak.ru/russian/investigations/2010/files/tu154m_101/finalreport_rus.pdf МЕЖГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ АВИАЦИОННЫЙ КОМИТЕТ КОМИССИЯ ПО РАССЛЕДОВАНИЮ АВИАЦИОННЫХ ПРОИСШЕСТВИЙ. ОКОНЧАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ОТЧЕТ ПО РАССЛЕДОВАНИЮ АВИАЦИОННОГО ПРОИСШЕСТВИЯ. (Russian version)

2011.05.30. http://www.unian.net/rus/news/news-443553.html 30.06.2011 17:04, ПОСЛЕДНИЕ НОВОСТИ. Оборудование самолета Качиньского отключилось до столкновения с землей?  Оборудование польского правительственного самолета Ту-154, который разбился 10 апреля 2010 года в российском Смоленске, перестало действовать еще до его столкновения с землей. Как передает корреспондент УНИАН в Польше, об этом заявил депутат оппозиционной партии «Право и справедливость» PіS) Антоний МАЧЕРЕВИЧ сегодня в Варшаве. По его данным, оборудование самолета перестало действовать, когда машина находилась на высоте 15 метров над уровнем взлетно-посадочной полосы. «Из исследования бортового компьютера известно, что тогда перестало действовать электропитание, и все механизмы этого самолета перестали действовать», - сказал А.МАЧЕРЕВИЧ, который сегодня представил вторую часть так называемой «Белой книги Смоленской трагедии». 

2012.04.12. http://www.rp.pl/artykul/10,858793-Prokuratura-spyta--czy-wrak-Tu-154-M-byl-oczyszczony.html Prokuratura spyta, czy wrak Tu-154 M był umyty. 12-04-2012 09:02. © Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone.

2012.06.27. http://niezalezna.pl/30420-nie-sledztwo-zacieranie-sladow To nie śledztwo, to zacieranie śladów. Dodano: 27.06.2012 [18:07. W sprawie Smoleńska mówimy o pseudośledztwie, a raczej należałoby powiedzieć: o zacieraniu śladów, które jest zniewagą, skandalem i przestępstwem popełnionym z niewyobrażalną arogancją. To wyraz pogardy wobec suwerenności i niepodległości Polski oraz policzek dla całej ludzkości – mówi Walter Jajko, generał amerykańskich Sił Powietrznych, w rozmowie z Leszkiem Misiakiem i Grzegorzem Wierzchołowskim.

2014.04.11. http://aillarionov.livejournal.com/668370.html Смоленская катастрофа: четыре года спустя. Доклад д-ра К.Новачика. 10:03 am April 11th, 2014

2014. http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/ZespolSmolenskMedia.nsf/files/ZSMK-9J2HEM/%24File/Cztery%20lata%20po%20Smoleńsku.pdf CZTERY LATA PO SMOLEŃSKU. JAK ZGINĄŁ PREZYDENT RP. Kwiecień 2014

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/designate-russia-state-sponsor-terrorism/XMjbTltM WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Designate Russia as "State Sponsor of Terrorism" In its unannounced war against Ukraine, Russia relies on covert operations which fall squarely within the definition of "international terrorism" under 18 U.S.C. § 2331. Specifically, armed operatives of Russia, acting under disguise, attempt to influence the policy of Ukrainian government by intimidation or coercion. They also try to affect the conduct of a government by assassinations and kidnapping, taking by force government buildings, police posts and military bases of Ukraine. This activity is being conducted on large scale and over prolonged time period, despite condemnation by the USA, G-7, NATO, EU and UN. Accordingly, Russia must be officially designated as "State sponsor of terrorism", per http://www.state.gov/j/ct/list/c14151.htm Created: Apr 23, 2014

http://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-z-kraju,3/katastrofa-smolenska-prokuratura-zarzuty-dla-rosyjskich-kontrolerow,528177.html RELACJA Z KONFERENCJI PROKURATURY. Co ustalili biegli? 10 najważniejszych punktów. 27 marca 2015, 13:41. Wojskowa Prokuratura Okręgowa w Warszawie przedstawiła w piątek opinię 20 biegłych dot. katastrofy smoleńskiej, którą przygotowywano dla niej przez cztery ostatnie lata. Co wynika z ich ekspertyz i jakie płyną z tego wnioski? 1. Błędy załogi. Zdaniem biegłych bezpośrednią przyczyną katastrofy było m.in. niewłaściwe działanie załogi polegające na zniżaniu samolotu poniżej warunków minimalnych do lądowania oraz niewydanie komendy odejścia. Było to "działanie nieadekwatne do panującej na lotnisku sytuacji meteorologicznej". Była mgła. Dowódca samolotu nie miał prawa, wobec braku widzialności Ziemi, zejść poniżej 120 m. Zakazu tego nie zmieniała zgoda wieży smoleńskiej na zejście do 100 m. Ponadto załoga tupolewa dwukrotnie była informowana przez polską załogę Jaka-40 o złej widoczności. 2. Naruszenie instrukcji Jako inną przyczynę katastrofy biegli wskazali "naruszenie reguł określonych w instrukcji użytkowania Tu-154 w locie" oraz "instrukcji współdziałania i technologii pracy członków załogi samolotu". 3. Załoga bez uprawnień Inną z przyczyn wskazanych przez biegłych były nieprawidłowości w związku z wyznaczeniem do obsługi lotu "osób bez ważnych uprawnień lub wręcz bez uprawnień do wykonywania lotów na tym typie samolotu". Jak wynika z opinii, spośród załogi jedynie technik pokładowy miał ważne uprawnienia do wykonywania tego lotu w tym dniu. 4. Zarzuty dla kontrolerów ze Smoleńska Wojskowa Prokuratura Okręgowa w Warszawie na podstawie opinii biegłych zdecydowała o postawieniu zarzutów popełnienia przestępstwa wobec dwóch rosyjskich kontrolerów ze Smoleńska Pierwszy z nich usłyszy zarzut sprowadzenia bezpośredniego niebezpieczeństwa katastrofy w ruchu powietrznym; drugi - zarzut nieumyślnego sprowadzenia katastrofy w ruchu powietrznym. Postanowienia o przedstawieniu zarzutów zapadły 24 marca. Kontrolerom grozi od 6 miesięcy do 8 lat więzienia. 5. Ani stan zdrowia załogi, ani stan techniczny samolotu nie miały wpływu na katastrofę Tu - 154 6. Zderzenie z przeszkodami terenowymi Zdaniem biegłych samolot zderzył się z przeszkodami terenowymi. Uszkodzenia nie powstały z innych przyczyn. - Rozkład szczątków samolotu jest naturalnym, fizycznie uzasadnionym skutkiem zderzenia samolotu z ziemią - stwierdzili. 7. Co z gen. Andrzejem Błasikiem? Biegli wskazali, że nie jest wykluczone, iż w kokpicie lub jego pobliżu przebywał gen. Andrzej Błasik. Nikt jednak nie miał prawa wydawać żadnych poleceń członkom załogi samolotu - podkreślono. 8. Co z Tomaszem Arabskim? Wojskowa Prokuratura Okręgowa w Warszawie przekaże Prokuraturze Okręgowej Warszawa-Praga materiały w sprawie uznania przez biegłych formalnego naruszenia instrukcji HEAD przez ówczesnego szefa Kancelarii Prezesa Rady Ministrów Tomasza Arabskiego. Biegli "wskazali szereg niekorzystnych zjawisk i rozwiązań wpływających negatywnie na bezpieczeństwo lotów VIP-ów". 9. Brak śladów oddziaływania ognia, osmoleń czy nadpaleń. Osmolenia - jak poinformowała prokuratura - występowały jedynie na drobniejszych fragmentach, tam, gdzie doszło do pożaru, co, jak podkreślono, jest zupełnie naturalne. 10. Śledztwo przedłużone Śledztwo ws. katastrofy smoleńskiej zostało przedłużone do 10 października 2015 r.

The preliminary version of this article appeared in 2010 at http://samlib.ru/k/kuznecow_d_j/katyn2e.shtml Russian version of this article: Катынь-2

2016.04.07. http://www.polradio.pl/5/38/Artykul/247801 ЗМІ: Дональд Туск мав знати про заміну тіл жертв Смоленської катастрофи 07.04.2016 15:50. Йдеться про останки екс-президента Польщі на еміграції Ришарда Качоровського. За повідомленням тижневика «Gazeta Polska», у вересні 2010 року тодішній прем'єр-міністр Польщі Дональд Туск був поінформований, що росіяни до труни останнього польського президента на еміграції Ришарда Качоровського, який загинув у Смоленській авіакатастрофі, помістили останки іншої особи.

2016.04.15. http://www.tvn24.pl/niepublikowane-nagranie-z-kokpitu-tu-154m,636030,s.html Ostatnie 38 minut lotu. Nagranie z kabiny prezydenckiego tupolewa. 15 kwietnia 2016, 21:48 (http://www.tvn24.pl). Tu-154M rozbił się 10 kwietnia 2010 r. Zginęło 96 osób To nagranie z kabiny prezydenckiego tupolewa pozwala bardziej precyzyjnie odtworzyć ostatnie chwile tragicznego lotu Tu-154M do Smoleńska. Jest połączeniem trzech ścieżek dźwiękowych: z mikrofonu i radia dowódcy, drugiego pilota i mikrofonów w kabinie. (http://www.tvn24.pl) Prezentujemy prawie cały zapis ostatnich 38 minut nagrań audio z kabiny Tu-154M nr 101 (ostatnie 4 sekundy nagrania zostały wycięte ze względu na drastyczną treść i poszanowanie pamięci ofiar). Napisy powstały na podstawie opublikowanego przez wojskową prokuraturę stenogramu, który przygotował zespół biegłych. Zachowaliśmy oryginalną pisownię ze stenogramów. Tekst wyróżniony kursywą to wypowiedzi, co do których biegli mieli wątpliwości. Słowa ujęte w stenogramie, a niesłyszalne w tym nagraniu, zostały zidentyfikowane przez biegłych przy użyciu specjalistycznego sprzętu odsłuchowego. Nagranie jest połączeniem trzech ścieżek dźwiękowych: z mikrofonu i radia dowódcy, drugiego pilota i mikrofonów w kabinie. Dla lepszego zrozumienia, w dwóch miejscach rozszyliśmy dźwięk. Pierwszy (godz. 8:24 i 15 sekund): to moment w którym jednocześnie dowódca rozmawia z więżą w Smoleńsku, a drugi pilot prowadzi korespondencję z załogą Jaka. Drugi: to ostatnie 40 sekund nagrania. Te publikujemy w trzech odsłonach. Każda powtórka prezentuje jedną ścieżkę dźwiękową (z kokpitu, mikrofonu i radia dowódcy, mikrofonu i radia drugiego pilota). Fragmenty nagrania zostały wykorzystane w materiale "Czarno na białym": (http://www.tvn24.pl)

2016.09.02. http://www.rp.pl/Polityka/309019884-Antoni-Macierewicz-zapowiada-ujawnienie-nowych-nagran-zalogi-tupolewa.html Andrzej Gajcy. Antoni Macierewicz zapowiada ujawnienie nowych nagrań załogi tupolewa. publikacja: 01.09.2016. aktualizacja: 02.09.2016, 16:11. Wkrótce ujawnimy nowe nagrania załogi tupolewa, które dotąd nie były znane – mówi szef resortu obrony, Antoni Macierewicz. 2016.09.02. http://newsader.com/29753-ministr-oborony-polshi-anonsiroval-sh/ Министр обороны Польши анонсировал «шокирующие признания» о том, что Кремль «намеренно» разрушил президентский борт. 18:3502.09.16. .. российские спецслужбы при непосредственной помощи диспетчеров в апреле 2010 года умышленно довели до гибели самолет Ту-154, на борту которого находились экс-президент Польши Лех Качинский и другие высокопоставленные чиновники государства. Об этом заявил министр обороны страны Антони Мацеревич в интервью ведущей польской газете Rzeczpospolita. .. "Нет сомнений в том, что действия диспетчеров России и властей Москвы неизбежно должны были привести к авиакатастрофе самолет с президентом Лехом Качиньским и всей делегацией на борту. Теперь это очевидно", — подчеркнул он. По словам министра, российские функционеры "намеренно совершили действия, направленные на разрушение самолета".

http://www.rp.pl/Katastrofa-smolenska/170809033-Podkomisja-smolenska-destrukcja-skrzydla-zaczela-sie-przed-zderzeniem-z-brzoza.html#ap-1 Kuba Kamiński. Podkomisja smoleńska: destrukcja skrzydła zaczęła się przed zderzeniem z brzozą. publikacja: 09.08.2017, aktualizacja: 09.08.2017, 12:52. "Podczas ostatniego posiedzenia plenarnego Podkomisji kierowanej przez dr. Kazimierza Nowaczyka w dniu 25 lipca br. uzgodniono stanowisko w kwestii czasu i pierwotnych przyczyn destrukcji lewego skrzydła Tu-154M" – napisała w opublikowanym w środę komunikacie rzeczniczka Podkomisji ds. Ponownego Zbadania Wypadku Lotniczego z 10 kwietnia 2010 r. Marta Palonek.

Keywords
Corruption, Designate Russia as state sponsor of terrorism, Fascism, Hague, KGB, Lethal decision, Nuremberg-2, Putin world war, Russia, Stop Putin, Terror, Usurpation, Vladimir Putin,

Катынь-2