Difference between revisions of "Experiment"

From TORI
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Experiment''' ([[Эксперимент]]) is sequence of actions, that includes [[observation]], aimed to confirm or to reject some [[hypothesis]], [[theory]], [[concept]].
+
'''Experiment''' ([[Эксперимент]]) is sequence of actions, that includes [[observation]], aimed to confirm or to reject ([[Refutability|refute]]) some [[hypothesis]], [[theory]], [[concept]].
   
 
Often, the term "experiment" refers to [[science]], and the goal is to support or to refute some specific concept.
 
Often, the term "experiment" refers to [[science]], and the goal is to support or to refute some specific concept.
Line 8: Line 8:
 
Not every experiment (even if it involves a measurement), is scientific.
 
Not every experiment (even if it involves a measurement), is scientific.
   
1. Some experiments that not assume the possibility of both confirmation, and refutation of a concept used for the planning and description.
+
1. Some experiments that not assume the possibility of both confirmation.
 
According to the terminology by [[Karl Popper]], the experiments that do not allow refutation of any scientific concept, should not be called "scientific".
 
According to the terminology by [[Karl Popper]], the experiments that do not allow refutation of any scientific concept, should not be called "scientific".
  +
In [[TORI]], the [[refutability]] is postulated as property of any scientific concept.
   
 
2. Some experiments are dangerous. Due to the [[observational selection]], the results of the dangerous experiments have poor scientific importance:
 
2. Some experiments are dangerous. Due to the [[observational selection]], the results of the dangerous experiments have poor scientific importance:
Line 17: Line 18:
 
http://masterdl.livejournal.com/1227096.html Whilde biest. Jul. 20th, 2012 at 1:38 PM.
 
http://masterdl.livejournal.com/1227096.html Whilde biest. Jul. 20th, 2012 at 1:38 PM.
 
</ref>.
 
</ref>.
 
In [[TORI]], in any of the two cases above, the experiment is qualified as non-scientific.
 
   
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 24: Line 23:
   
 
==Keywords==
 
==Keywords==
[[Science]],
 
 
[[Concept]],
 
[[Concept]],
  +
[[Observation]],
 
[[Philosophy]],
 
[[Philosophy]],
  +
[[Place of science in the human knowledge]],
[[Observation]],
 
  +
[[Refutability]],
 
  +
[[Science]],
   
  +
[[Category:Articles in English]]
  +
[[Category:English]]
 
[[Category:Experiment]]
 
[[Category:Experiment]]
  +
[[Category:Philosophy]]
  +
[[Category:Refutabiliry]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category:Phylosophy]]
 
[[Category:Articles in English]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:00, 1 December 2018

Experiment (Эксперимент) is sequence of actions, that includes observation, aimed to confirm or to reject (refute) some hypothesis, theory, concept.

Often, the term "experiment" refers to science, and the goal is to support or to refute some specific concept.

At least two possible results of the observation should be taken into account at the planning of scientific experiment.

Non–scientific experiments

Not every experiment (even if it involves a measurement), is scientific.

1. Some experiments that not assume the possibility of both confirmation. According to the terminology by Karl Popper, the experiments that do not allow refutation of any scientific concept, should not be called "scientific". In TORI, the refutability is postulated as property of any scientific concept.

2. Some experiments are dangerous. Due to the observational selection, the results of the dangerous experiments have poor scientific importance: if thousands experimentalists dead, performing some specific dangerous experiment, and one occasionally is alives and successful, the method cannot be considered as scientific tool [1].

References

  1. http://masterdl.livejournal.com/1227096.html Whilde biest. Jul. 20th, 2012 at 1:38 PM.

Keywords

Concept, Observation, Philosophy, Place of science in the human knowledge, Refutability, Science,