Difference between revisions of "OmSum"

From TORI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
Definition.
 
Definition.
 
For any set of numbered functions \(f\)
 
For any set of numbered functions \(f\)
refined at some set \(\mathcal G\)
+
defined at some set \(\mathcal G\)
 
with values in the same set,
 
with values in the same set,
   
Line 32: Line 32:
 
\end{eqnarray}
 
\end{eqnarray}
   
for \(m>n\), for any \(z\in \mathcal G\);
+
for \(m>n\), for any \(z\in \mathcal G\),
   
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
\begin{eqnarray}
Line 46: Line 46:
 
then, the resulting function is evaluated at
 
then, the resulting function is evaluated at
 
the specified value,
 
the specified value,
id est, at \( f_m(x) \).
+
id est, at \( f_m(z) \).
   
 
==Notations==
 
==Notations==
Line 59: Line 59:
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
\OmSum_{j=n}^n f_j(s,x) \bullet x &~=~&
 
\OmSum_{j=n}^n f_j(s,x) \bullet x &~=~&
(s,z)\!\mapsto\! f_n(s,z) \\
+
z\!\mapsto\! f_n(s,z) \\
 
\OmSum_{j=n}^m f_j(s,x) \bullet x ~ (z)&~=~& \OmSum_{j=n}^{m-1} f_j(s,x)\bullet x ~ ~ (f_m(s,z))
 
\OmSum_{j=n}^m f_j(s,x) \bullet x ~ (z)&~=~& \OmSum_{j=n}^{m-1} f_j(s,x)\bullet x ~ ~ (f_m(s,z))
 
\label{bul}
 
\label{bul}
Line 78: Line 78:
 
[[Iterate]],
 
[[Iterate]],
 
[[MathJax]],
 
[[MathJax]],
  +
[[MhSum]],
  +
[[OmSum]],
 
[[Superfunction]]
 
[[Superfunction]]
   
   
 
[[Category:English]]
 
[[Category:English]]
  +
[[Category:Iterate]]
 
[[Category:James David Nixon]]
 
[[Category:James David Nixon]]
 
[[Category:MathJax]]
 
[[Category:MathJax]]

Latest revision as of 11:07, 17 May 2021

OmSum is notation for combination of functions suggested by James David Nixon [1].

\( \newcommand{\OmSum} {\mathop{\Large\Omega} } \) He uses the compact notations \(\mathrm{OmSum}=\OmSum \).

Operation OmSum appears as generalization of iterate; during the iteration, the shape of the iterand (iterated function) may change.

Definition

Definition. For any set of numbered functions \(f\) defined at some set \(\mathcal G\) with values in the same set,

\begin{eqnarray} \OmSum_{j=n}^n f_j = f_n \label{o} \end{eqnarray}

for \(m>n\), for any \(z\in \mathcal G\),

\begin{eqnarray} \OmSum_{j=n}^m f_j ~ (z)= \OmSum_{j=n}^{m-1} f_j ~ (f_m(z)) \label{om} \end{eqnarray}

Operation \( \OmSum \) has high priority. In the last expression of equation (\ref{om}), first the operation OmSum is performed; then, the resulting function is evaluated at the specified value, id est, at \( f_m(z) \).

Notations

Sometimes, the iterated function should be indicated with its argument (for example, if there is some additional parameter), \begin{eqnarray} f_j(z)=f_j(s,z) \end{eqnarray}

Then, the dummy argument can be indicated after the \( \bullet \):

\begin{eqnarray} \OmSum_{j=n}^n f_j(s,x) \bullet x &~=~& z\!\mapsto\! f_n(s,z) \\ \OmSum_{j=n}^m f_j(s,x) \bullet x ~ (z)&~=~& \OmSum_{j=n}^{m-1} f_j(s,x)\bullet x ~ ~ (f_m(s,z)) \label{bul} \end{eqnarray}

Again, due to priority, in the right hand side of equation (\ref{bul}), first, expression
\(\displaystyle\OmSum_{j=n}^{m-1} f_j(s,z)\bullet z\)
should be calculated; then, the resulting function should be evaluated at argument specified; the dummy parameter \(x\) should be replaced \(x \rightarrow f_m(s,z) \)

References

  1. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.05111v1 James David Nixon. \(Δy=e^sy\) or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Γ-function [Submitted on 1 Oct 2019]

Keywords

Iterate, MathJax, MhSum, OmSum, Superfunction