Difference between revisions of "Naga"

From TORI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m (Text replacement - "\$([^\$]+)\$" to "\\(\1\\)")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[naga]] is special function that appears at the estimate of the loss of the [[pinhole waveguide]] in the [[paraxial approximation]]. naga is expressed as integral of the simple combination of the [[Bessel function]] [[BesselJ0]] with elementary functions:
 
[[naga]] is special function that appears at the estimate of the loss of the [[pinhole waveguide]] in the [[paraxial approximation]]. naga is expressed as integral of the simple combination of the [[Bessel function]] [[BesselJ0]] with elementary functions:
   
$\displaystyle\mathrm{naga}(p)=2\int_0^\infty \frac{J_0(L_1 x)^2}{(1-x^2)^2} \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm dx$
+
\(\displaystyle\mathrm{naga}(p)=2\int_0^\infty \frac{J_0(L_1 x)^2}{(1-x^2)^2} \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm dx\)
   
where $L_1\!=$[[BesselJZero]][0,1]$\approx\! 2.4$ is the first zero of the Bessel function; $J_0(L_1)=0$.
+
where \(L_1\!=\)[[BesselJZero]][0,1]\(\approx\! 2.4\) is the first zero of the Bessel function; \(J_0(L_1)=0\).
   
 
==Relation with other functions==
 
==Relation with other functions==
For the efficient evaluation of [[naga]] defined above, especially for integration in vicinity of $x\!=\!0$, various special functions are defined:
+
For the efficient evaluation of [[naga]] defined above, especially for integration in vicinity of \(x\!=\!0\), various special functions are defined:
   
[[mori]]$(x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 (L_1 x)}{1-x^2}~;$
+
[[mori]]\((x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 (L_1 x)}{1-x^2}~;\)
$~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm d x$
+
\(~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm d x\)
   
[[kori]]$(x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 \big(L_1 \sqrt{x}\big)}{1-x}~;$
+
[[kori]]\((x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 \big(L_1 \sqrt{x}\big)}{1-x}~;\)
$~\displaystyle
+
\(~\displaystyle
\mathrm{naga}(p)= \int_0^\infty \mathrm{kori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x)\, \mathrm d x$
+
\mathrm{naga}(p)= \int_0^\infty \mathrm{kori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x)\, \mathrm d x\)
   
The corresponding limit at $x\!=\!1$ is assumed for definitions of functions [[mori]] and [[kori]].
+
The corresponding limit at \(x\!=\!1\) is assumed for definitions of functions [[mori]] and [[kori]].
   
 
==Application==
 
==Application==
Line 22: Line 22:
 
Then, the loss of the [[pinhole waveguide]] is expressed with function [[maga]],
 
Then, the loss of the [[pinhole waveguide]] is expressed with function [[maga]],
   
[[maga]]$(p )=1-|\mathrm{naga}(p )|^2$
+
[[maga]]\((p )=1-|\mathrm{naga}(p )|^2\)
   
at least for real values of $p$. Then, [[maga]]$(p )$ can be interpreted as loss of waveguide made of equidistant pinholes of radius $R L_1/k$ separated with distance $2 p R^2/k^2$, for paraxial wave with wavenumber $k$. For the physical interpretation and application to the paraxial optics, parameter $R$ is supposed to be large real number, id est, $R\!\gg\! 1~$.
+
at least for real values of \(p\). Then, [[maga]]\((p )\) can be interpreted as loss of waveguide made of equidistant pinholes of radius \(R L_1/k\) separated with distance \(2 p R^2/k^2\), for paraxial wave with wavenumber \(k\). For the physical interpretation and application to the paraxial optics, parameter \(R\) is supposed to be large real number, id est, \(R\!\gg\! 1~\).
   
For complex $p$, expression
+
For complex \(p\), expression
   
[[maga]]$(p )=1-\mathrm{naga}(p )\, \mathrm{naga}(p^*)^*$
+
[[maga]]\((p )=1-\mathrm{naga}(p )\, \mathrm{naga}(p^*)^*\)
   
 
can be considered; however, the special care about the contour of integration in the expressions above is necessary to provide convergence of the integrals at infinity.
 
can be considered; however, the special care about the contour of integration in the expressions above is necessary to provide convergence of the integrals at infinity.
Line 37: Line 37:
 
==Evaluation==
 
==Evaluation==
   
For the representation of naga$(p )$ through function [[mori]], at positive $p$,
+
For the representation of naga\((p )\) through function [[mori]], at positive \(p\),
   
$~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r\, \mathrm d r$
+
\(~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r\, \mathrm d r\)
   
 
the following contour of integration is suggested:
 
the following contour of integration is suggested:
   
1. Integration along the real axis from zero to $L_1/p$ .
+
1. Integration along the real axis from zero to \(L_1/p\) .
   
2. Integration from $r=L_1/p$ to $r=L_1/p+\sqrt{\mathrm i} \infty$ along line $\Im(r)=\Re(r)-L_1/p$ in the complex $r$–plane.
+
2. Integration from \(r=L_1/p\) to \(r=L_1/p+\sqrt{\mathrm i} \infty\) along line \(\Im(r)=\Re(r)-L_1/p\) in the complex \(r\)–plane.
   
 
For the first part of the contour, the intelligent fit of function [[kori]] seems to be useful.
 
For the first part of the contour, the intelligent fit of function [[kori]] seems to be useful.
   
For the second part, at small $p$, the asymptotic approximation of function [[mori]] seems to be useful,
+
For the second part, at small \(p\), the asymptotic approximation of function [[mori]] seems to be useful,
   
[[mori]]$(z)\approx\,$[[morias]]$_m(z)~$, $~z\rightarrow \infty$, with integer $m$ and
+
[[mori]]\((z)\approx\,\)[[morias]]\(_m(z)~\), \(~z\rightarrow \infty\), with integer \(m\) and
   
$\displaystyle
+
\(\displaystyle
 
\mathrm{morias}_m(z) = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi L_1}} z^{-5/2} \, G_m(z^2)\,
 
\mathrm{morias}_m(z) = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi L_1}} z^{-5/2} \, G_m(z^2)\,
 
\cos\left( - \frac{\pi}{4} + L_1 z\, F_m(z^2) \right)
 
\cos\left( - \frac{\pi}{4} + L_1 z\, F_m(z^2) \right)
  +
\)
$
 
   
 
where <br>
 
where <br>
$G_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} g_n x^{-n}$ <br>
+
\(G_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} g_n x^{-n}\) <br>
$F_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} f_n x^{-n}$
+
\(F_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} f_n x^{-n}\)
   
Approximations for the coefficients $f$ and $g$ follow from the asymptotic expansion of the [[Hankel function]];
+
Approximations for the coefficients \(f\) and \(g\) follow from the asymptotic expansion of the [[Hankel function]];
   
$\begin{array}{l}
+
\(\begin{array}{l}
 
f_0=1\\
 
f_0=1\\
 
f_1=- 0.021614383628830615865\\
 
f_1=- 0.021614383628830615865\\
Line 78: Line 78:
 
f_{11}=-1487.942880868968812\\
 
f_{11}=-1487.942880868968812\\
 
f_{12}=29785.50901270392374\\
 
f_{12}=29785.50901270392374\\
\end{array}$
+
\end{array}\)
  +
\(~\)
$~$
 
$\begin{array}{l}
+
\(\begin{array}{l}
 
g_0=1 \\
 
g_0=1 \\
 
g_1=0.989192808185584692068 \\
 
g_1=0.989192808185584692068 \\
Line 94: Line 94:
 
g_{11}= -14844.4023379433794\\
 
g_{11}= -14844.4023379433794\\
 
g_{12}=328204.367306340176
 
g_{12}=328204.367306340176
\end{array}$
+
\end{array}\)
   
 
Aproximation of the integrand through funciton [[morias]] appears as follows:
 
Aproximation of the integrand through funciton [[morias]] appears as follows:
   
$\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,r)=\mathrm{morias}_m(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r$
+
\(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,r)=\mathrm{morias}_m(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r\)
   
for $p\!=\!0.1$ and $m\!=\!11$, compex map of this approximation is expected to be shown in figure at right
+
for \(p\!=\!0.1\) and \(m\!=\!11\), compex map of this approximation is expected to be shown in figure at right
 
'''(sorry, is not loaded yet)'''<br>
 
'''(sorry, is not loaded yet)'''<br>
with lines $u=\Re(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}$<br>
+
with lines \(u=\Re(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}\)<br>
and lines $v=\Im(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}$<br>
+
and lines \(v=\Im(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}\)<br>
in the $x$, $y$ plane.
+
in the \(x\), \(y\) plane.
   
 
At the same figure, the suggested contour of integration described above is shown with thick green line.
 
At the same figure, the suggested contour of integration described above is shown with thick green line.

Revision as of 18:48, 30 July 2019

naga is special function that appears at the estimate of the loss of the pinhole waveguide in the paraxial approximation. naga is expressed as integral of the simple combination of the Bessel function BesselJ0 with elementary functions:

\(\displaystyle\mathrm{naga}(p)=2\int_0^\infty \frac{J_0(L_1 x)^2}{(1-x^2)^2} \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm dx\)

where \(L_1\!=\)BesselJZero[0,1]\(\approx\! 2.4\) is the first zero of the Bessel function; \(J_0(L_1)=0\).

Relation with other functions

For the efficient evaluation of naga defined above, especially for integration in vicinity of \(x\!=\!0\), various special functions are defined:

mori\((x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 (L_1 x)}{1-x^2}~;\) \(~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x^2)\, x\, \mathrm d x\)

kori\((x)=\displaystyle \frac{ J_0 \big(L_1 \sqrt{x}\big)}{1-x}~;\) \(~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)= \int_0^\infty \mathrm{kori}(x)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p x)\, \mathrm d x\)

The corresponding limit at \(x\!=\!1\) is assumed for definitions of functions mori and kori.

Application

In the single mode approximation, the only Besselian mode is taken into account. Then, the loss of the pinhole waveguide is expressed with function maga,

maga\((p )=1-|\mathrm{naga}(p )|^2\)

at least for real values of \(p\). Then, maga\((p )\) can be interpreted as loss of waveguide made of equidistant pinholes of radius \(R L_1/k\) separated with distance \(2 p R^2/k^2\), for paraxial wave with wavenumber \(k\). For the physical interpretation and application to the paraxial optics, parameter \(R\) is supposed to be large real number, id est, \(R\!\gg\! 1~\).

For complex \(p\), expression

maga\((p )=1-\mathrm{naga}(p )\, \mathrm{naga}(p^*)^*\)

can be considered; however, the special care about the contour of integration in the expressions above is necessary to provide convergence of the integrals at infinity. Then, maga is expected to be holomorphic function.

Following the main ideology of TORI, the functions mentioned above are supposed to be analysed and implemented for the whole complex plane, even if the direct application mentioned above refers only to the real values of the argument. The analysis of the holomorphic properties of the functions involved is supposed to reveal the errors, mistakes in the deduction, if any, to allow refutation of the basic concept of the pinhole waveguide, if this concept is wrong.

Evaluation

For the representation of naga\((p )\) through function mori, at positive \(p\),

\(~\displaystyle \mathrm{naga}(p)=2 \int_0^\infty \mathrm{mori}(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r\, \mathrm d r\)

the following contour of integration is suggested:

1. Integration along the real axis from zero to \(L_1/p\) .

2. Integration from \(r=L_1/p\) to \(r=L_1/p+\sqrt{\mathrm i} \infty\) along line \(\Im(r)=\Re(r)-L_1/p\) in the complex \(r\)–plane.

For the first part of the contour, the intelligent fit of function kori seems to be useful.

For the second part, at small \(p\), the asymptotic approximation of function mori seems to be useful,

mori\((z)\approx\,\)morias\(_m(z)~\), \(~z\rightarrow \infty\), with integer \(m\) and

\(\displaystyle \mathrm{morias}_m(z) = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi L_1}} z^{-5/2} \, G_m(z^2)\, \cos\left( - \frac{\pi}{4} + L_1 z\, F_m(z^2) \right) \)

where
\(G_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} g_n x^{-n}\)
\(F_m(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{m} f_n x^{-n}\)

Approximations for the coefficients \(f\) and \(g\) follow from the asymptotic expansion of the Hankel function;

\(\begin{array}{l} f_0=1\\ f_1=- 0.021614383628830615865\\ f_2=0.0019465899152260872595\\ f_3=-0.0010834984344719114778\\ f_4=0.001464410164512283719\\ f_5=-0.003628876399615993660\\ f_6=0.01431760830195380729\\ f_7=-0.0824438982874790057\\ f_8=0.652747801052423657\\ f_9=-6.80376838070624330\\ f_{10}=90.322658904953727\\ f_{11}=-1487.942880868968812\\ f_{12}=29785.50901270392374\\ \end{array}\) \(~\) \(\begin{array}{l} g_0=1 \\ g_1=0.989192808185584692068 \\ g_2=0.99228788615079417081 \\ g_3= 0.989481317221334367489\\ g_4= 0.994709980602617872387\\ g_5= 0.97818700495778240956\\ g_6=1.0575251177784290263\\ g_7= 0.5188843197279991625\\ g_8=5.432808917007474985\\ g_9=-52.5640507009104629\\ g_{10}=807.429675670594971\\ g_{11}= -14844.4023379433794\\ g_{12}=328204.367306340176 \end{array}\)

Aproximation of the integrand through funciton morias appears as follows:

\(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,r)=\mathrm{morias}_m(r)^2 \, \exp(\mathrm i p r^2)\, r\)

for \(p\!=\!0.1\) and \(m\!=\!11\), compex map of this approximation is expected to be shown in figure at right (sorry, is not loaded yet)
with lines \(u=\Re(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}\)
and lines \(v=\Im(\mathrm{integrand}_m(p,x\!+\!\mathrm i y))=\mathrm{const}\)
in the \(x\), \(y\) plane.

At the same figure, the suggested contour of integration described above is shown with thick green line.

For evaluation of function naga, descriptions of functions kori and mori are loaded.

References


Keywords

Bessel function, BesselJ0, mori, kori, Morinaga function, Pinhole waveguide