Difference between revisions of "TORI axioms"

From TORI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(This is half)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[TORI axioms]] ([[Аксиомы ТОРИ]]) are postulates, used in definition of [[Science]].
−
#redirect[[TORI axiom]]
  
  +
  +
==History==
  +
  +
The [[TORI axioms]] are formulated in 2009 as generalization, interpretation of the empiric observations of
  +
ways of the scientific research. The experience of dealing with as the honest errors, as the intentional frauds and demagogy
  +
is taken into account.
  +
These axioms are published in 2010 in the first article of the [[Far East Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Physics]]
  +
<ref>
  +
http://pphmj.com/abstract/5076.htm D.Kouznetsov. Support of non-traditional concepts. Far East Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, 1, No.1, p.1-6 (2010)
  +
</ref>,
  +
and then, in 2011, in the more detailed article [[Place of science in the human knowledge]]
  +
written for the Russian journal [[Uspekhi]]
  +
<ref>
  +
http://ufn.ru/tribune/trib120111 Д.Ю.Кузнецов. Место науки и физики в человеческом знании. УФН, т.181, Трибуна, p.1-9 (2011)
  +
</ref>.
  +
  +
In 2011, on the base of the [[TORI axioms]], the site tori.ils.uec.ac.jp/TORI had been created.
  +
The name [[TORI axioms]] is shosen after the name of that site. The site is available since
  +
2011 March to 2013 February. 2013February 27, the site had been attacked by the cruel opponents,
  +
and since that, it is not available at its original URL.
  +
Some articles from there are copypasted to http://samlib.ru/k/kuznecow_d_j
  +
and to http://mizugadro.mydns.jp .
  +
The [[TORI axioms]] are mentioned in at the [[Main Page]] of this site.
  +
  +
Below, the [[TORI axioms]] are repeated. Any [[concept]] is qualified as [[science}scientific]], if it satisfies all the 6 axioms below.
  +
  +
==Postulates==
  +
  +
  +
  +
'''S1. [[Applicability]]''': The concept has some limited range of validity, distinguishable from the empty set.
  +
  +
'''S2. [[Verifiability]]''': In the terms of the already accepted concepts, some specific experiment with some specific result, that confirms the concept, can be described.
  +
  +
'''S3. [[Refutability]]''': In the terms of the concept, some specific experiment with some specific result, that negates the concept, can be described.
  +
  +
'''S4. [[Selfconsistency]]''': No internal contradictions of the concept are known.
  +
  +
'''S5. [[Principle of correspondence]]''': If the range of validity of a new concept intersects the range of validity of another already accepted concept, then, the new concept either reproduces the results of the old concept, or indicates the way to refute it. (For example, the estimate of the range of validity of the old concept may be wrong.)
  +
  +
'''S6. Pluralism''': Mutually-contradictive concepts may coexist; if two concepts satisfying S1-S5 have some common range of validity, then, in this range, the simplest of them has priority.
  +
  +
  +
  +
  +
==References==
  +
  +
<references/>
  +
  +
==Keywords==
  +
  +
[[Female logic]],
  +
[[logics]],
  +
[[Place of science in the human knowledge]],
  +
[[Relifion]],
  +
[[TORI]],
  +
[[Philosophy]],
  +
  +
  +
[[Category:Articles in English]]
  +
[[Category:TORI]]
  +
[[Category:TORI axioms]]
  +
[[Category:Philosophy]]
  +
[[Category:Religion]]
  +
[[Category:Science]]

Revision as of 15:19, 29 June 2013

TORI axioms (Аксиомы ТОРИ) are postulates, used in definition of Science.

History

The TORI axioms are formulated in 2009 as generalization, interpretation of the empiric observations of ways of the scientific research. The experience of dealing with as the honest errors, as the intentional frauds and demagogy is taken into account. These axioms are published in 2010 in the first article of the Far East Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Physics [1], and then, in 2011, in the more detailed article Place of science in the human knowledge written for the Russian journal Uspekhi [2].

In 2011, on the base of the TORI axioms, the site tori.ils.uec.ac.jp/TORI had been created. The name TORI axioms is shosen after the name of that site. The site is available since 2011 March to 2013 February. 2013February 27, the site had been attacked by the cruel opponents, and since that, it is not available at its original URL. Some articles from there are copypasted to http://samlib.ru/k/kuznecow_d_j and to http://mizugadro.mydns.jp . The TORI axioms are mentioned in at the Main Page of this site.

Below, the TORI axioms are repeated. Any concept is qualified as [[science}scientific]], if it satisfies all the 6 axioms below.

Postulates

S1. Applicability: The concept has some limited range of validity, distinguishable from the empty set.

S2. Verifiability: In the terms of the already accepted concepts, some specific experiment with some specific result, that confirms the concept, can be described.

S3. Refutability: In the terms of the concept, some specific experiment with some specific result, that negates the concept, can be described.

S4. Selfconsistency: No internal contradictions of the concept are known.

S5. Principle of correspondence: If the range of validity of a new concept intersects the range of validity of another already accepted concept, then, the new concept either reproduces the results of the old concept, or indicates the way to refute it. (For example, the estimate of the range of validity of the old concept may be wrong.)

S6. Pluralism: Mutually-contradictive concepts may coexist; if two concepts satisfying S1-S5 have some common range of validity, then, in this range, the simplest of them has priority.



References

  1. ↑ http://pphmj.com/abstract/5076.htm D.Kouznetsov. Support of non-traditional concepts. Far East Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, 1, No.1, p.1-6 (2010)
  2. ↑ http://ufn.ru/tribune/trib120111 Д.Ю.Кузнецов. Место науки и физики в человеческом знании. УФН, т.181, Трибуна, p.1-9 (2011)

Keywords

Female logic, logics, Place of science in the human knowledge, Relifion, TORI, Philosophy,

Retrieved from "https://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php?title=TORI_axioms&oldid=6134"