ChatGPT in TORI

ChatGPT in TORI is statement generated by ChatGPT about its contribution to TORI.

Initially, the statement had been designed as section «Нападение_США_на_Венесуэлу#Notes_by_ChatGPT» of article «Нападение США на Венесуэлу».

The "Notes" happen to be pretty general. They can be applied to several articles generated by ChatGPT and/or written with assistance by ChatGPT.
For this reason, the "Notes" are loaded here, in a separate article, to be torilinked from other articles generated by ChatGPT and/or edited with help of ChatGPT.

The meaning of the statement by ChatGPT can be interpreted as follows:

If some brilliant, excellent wording is found that is useful in various branches of Research, then this is important achievement of ChatGPT and its designers. Consider to sponsor their activity.

On the other hand, if some severe methodological error is detected on the TORI article, even if it is generated by ChatGPT and/or written with assistance of ChatGPT, - then, this is fault of the Top Editor of TORI.
So, please, communicate the Editor in order to correct the mistake.

The original statement by ChatGPT is copipasted in the section below.

Notes by ChatGPT

The following notes clarify the role and limitations of the feedback provided by ChatGPT during the preparation of this article.

1. **Methodological role only**

  ChatGPT did not supply primary facts, eyewitness accounts, or exclusive information.
  Its contribution was limited to:
  * structuring arguments,
  * improving internal consistency,
  * separating factual statements from interpretations,
  * suggesting clearer attribution of motives and hypotheses.

2. **Model-based interpretation**

  Where applicable, the feedback relied on explicit analytical models already used in TORI,
  in particular «Rule of Newspeak».
  Interpretations derived from such models should be understood as *conditional*:
  they are valid only within the stated assumptions of the model.

3. **No claim of neutrality**

  ChatGPT does not assert political, moral, or legal neutrality.
  Suggestions aimed to improve clarity, falsifiability, and internal logic,
  not to balance viewpoints or to meet encyclopedic neutrality standards
  such as those adopted by Wikipedia.

4. **Alternative hypotheses**

  When multiple explanations of the same events are possible,
  ChatGPT encouraged explicit enumeration of hypotheses
  (including weak or non-constructive ones),
  in order to avoid implicit assumptions and hidden premises.

5. **Responsibility and authorship**

  Final wording, selection of sources, interpretations, and conclusions
  remain entirely the responsibility of the Editor.
  The presence of these notes does not imply endorsement of the article
  by OpenAI or by ChatGPT as an institution.

These notes are provided for transparency and reproducibility of the editorial process.

Warning

Not all articles generated by ChatGPT or written with assistance of CharGPT are listed among the "Keywords" below.

For the more complete spisok, look at https://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php?title=Category:ChatGPT

References

https://chatgpt.com/

Keywords

«196o», «Bridging Probability Theory and Statistical Estimation», «Ce-144», «ChatGPT», «ChatGPT in TORI», «Cognitive loop of propaganda», «Conrec6 demo», «Conrec6.cin», «ContoTestMaps», «ContoTestQuadraticMap», «DispatcherAndBaseJ», «From Moon to Earth with antiwing», «From Moon to Earth with antiwing by ChatGPT», «GlyphChatGPT», «KurzenkovToPutin», «LogTestMaps», «MapConrec6demo», «Moscow Agent Governing America C», «Phytoextraction», «Propaganda spectroscopy», «Диспетчер и база», «Нападение США на Венесуэлу», «Передовой самолёт», «⼼confuse», «かようび», «もくようび», «心confuse», «平日»,