Search results

Create the page "Notation" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Mediawiki
  This wiki, id est, [[TORI]] had been created for elaborating of the common notation suitable in the scientific research.
  1 KB (211 words) - 14:24, 20 June 2013
• Factorial
  Frequently, the [[postfix]] notation <math>n!</math> is used for the factorial of number <math>n</math>. Notation \(\sqrt{!} (z)\) happened to be not so convenient, some colleagues, who do
  27 KB (3,925 words) - 18:26, 30 July 2019
• Tetration
  ...o unity. In the language [[Mathematica]], there already exists the special notation for the superfunction, id est, the function '''Nest'''. In particular,
  21 KB (3,175 words) - 23:37, 2 May 2021
• Natural number
  ...ue''', other two have value '''false'''. (in order to use word "two", this notation have been defined above). Then,
  13 KB (2,014 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• Mizugadro number
  ...gh it can be easily described by recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or the equivalent, as was done by Graham. The last ten digits of Graham's n
  9 KB (1,393 words) - 00:41, 7 July 2020
• SuperFactorial
  as if takes place for the exponentiation. This justifies the notation [[square root of factorial]] for the half–iteration of Factorial, id est
  18 KB (2,278 words) - 00:03, 29 February 2024
• ArcTetration
  Such a notation may cause confusion, because [[ArcTetration]] is not a [[superfunction]] of
  7 KB (1,091 words) - 23:03, 30 November 2019
• Class of equivalence
  The notation with horizontal fraction is also used,
  7 KB (1,216 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• Iteration
  For iteration of functions, the same notation is used also by [[Walter Bergweiler]]
  14 KB (2,203 words) - 06:36, 20 July 2020
• Iterated integral
  ...he letter \(I\) is used instead of \(J\), but that notation conflicts with notation \(I\) as [[imaginary unit]]
  9 KB (1,321 words) - 18:26, 30 July 2019
• ArcCip
  Instead of [[ArcCip]], notation [[ArcCosc]] seems to be better.
  8 KB (1,211 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• Sazae-san constants
  ...script of the Sazae-san constant is omitted, and it not specified that the notation refers to the array of constants, the subscript is supposed to be unity.
  4 KB (495 words) - 18:47, 30 July 2019
• Bessel transform
  It is not clear which notation is better; so, perhaps, both notations will be used in [[TORI]].
  8 KB (1,183 words) - 10:21, 20 July 2020
• BesselJ0
  [[Complex map]] of function BesselJ0 is shown in figure at right. The short notation \(J_0=\mathrm{BesselJ0}\) is also valid.
  6 KB (913 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• BesselY0
  ...(N_0\). In the latest editions and in the tables by [[Abramowits,Stegun]], notation \(Y_0\) is used.
  3 KB (445 words) - 18:26, 30 July 2019
• Cylindric function
  ...lazy and did not provide different images for characlters I, l and | ; the notation suggested allows to avoid confusions: L and i are easier to distinguish tha
  3 KB (388 words) - 18:26, 30 July 2019
• ArcLogisticSequence
  and the [[mathematic notation]]s, the space is usually interpreted as operation of multiplication or [[co
  3 KB (380 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• SuZex
  [[Category:TORI notation]]
  7 KB (1,076 words) - 18:25, 30 July 2019
• Trappmann function
  It is not yet clear, which notation is better, with capitalisation or just lowercase letters. ...capitalisation; and for the authomatic handling with robots, the lowercase notation seem to be better.
  9 KB (1,320 words) - 11:38, 20 July 2020
• 2013.03.04.Statement
  If You dislike some notation, then You are supposed to suggest some Your notation, that You believe to be more convenient.
  2 KB (376 words) - 15:03, 20 June 2013

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)