# Scientific fact

Scientific fact (Научный факт) is Scientific concept, that has no competitors at least in some range of its applicability.

Scientific fact satisfies the TORI axioms and, in addition, is main concept qith respect to any other known concepts that are cover the same range of applicability.

## Examples

Before the heliocentric system of Universe, the geocentric system by Ptolemy is scientific fact.

Before the experiments with nuclear reactions, the concept of conservation of number of atoms of each kind in a closed system is scientific fact.

While the artificial life is not created in a laboratory from non–living materials, Biogenesis is Scientific fact. This applies even to the most radical form of Biogenesis: The life at the Earth is created by God, and there is no other way to create life from non-lining objects.

Until creation (and reporting) of the Quantum mechanics and the Special theory of relativity, the Classical mechanics is scientific fact.

The system of axioms of Arithmetics is scientific fact. The hypothesis of existence of the big number, called the Mizugadro number, such that the Arithmetics axiom lead to a contradiction being applied to this number, is considered in article Mizugadro number dream (Число Мизугадро, сон) [1].

However, the hypothesis of existence of the Mizugadro number is not a Scientific concept. It does not satisfy the Second TORI axiom, it is not refutable. We cannot prove the self-consistency of the system of axioms of Arithmetics.

The hypothesis of existence and uniqueness of tetration is scientific fact. Tetration $\mathrm{tet}$ is holomorphic solution of equation $\exp(\mathrm{tet}(z))=\mathrm{tet}(z\!+\!1)$, satisfying certain additional conditions (see Superfunctions) [2][3].

Causality is Scientific fact. Every event can be described as result of events that happen before it.

Concept that the Nevsky Express bombing in 2009 had been performed upon approval of Edro, is scientific fact, at least until another scientific concept is suggested to explain, how the Edros could submit the statements about the mass memorial meetings about that catastrophe before the catastrophe. In such a way, the causality principle indicates, that the crash of the Nevsly Express happened as result of the terroristic act.

Concept about corruption of the Putins election committees is scientific fact. These committees perform the election fraud; no other scientific concept is available to explain the appearance of the reports about the fraud [4][5][6][7].

Concept Putin killed Nemtsov is scientific fact. No other scientific concept is available to describe the behaviour of criminalists, who investigated the case. The criminalists could not answer the key questions about the case; then just ignored the disappearance of videorecords of the crime made by the monitoring cameras placed at the Kremlin wall and at the posts of the Nemtsov bridge. Such a sabotage has no other explanation. This indicates, confirms, verifies, proves the involvement of Vladimir Putin in that murder.

Involvement of KGB in the organisation of catastrophe of airplane A321, performed рейс7k9268 and crashed 2015.10.31 at the Sinai, is scientific fact. No other concept is available to describe absence of the videorecords of the crash by the monitoring cameras on board, that were supposed to transfer the images to the ground stations in real time. Nor the ignorance of that absence by the research group is explained by other concepts about that crash.

2017.09.25.Puff, trace of contamination[8]

2017.09.25.Puff is attributed to Mayak. This company has certain reputation, that includes both, high contamination of wide territory with unstable isotopes and hiding the information on it. Since the concept had been formulated, it got several independent verifications; so, it is qualified as theory. No other possible source of contamination is suggested as a scientific concept. In this sense, concept, that administration of Mayak had been committed that puff, is scientific fact.

## Irrefutable facts and terminology

In TORI, the refutability is postulated as necessary property of any scientific concept, just due to the TORI axioms.

In particular, no one scientific fact can be irrefutable. This may cause confusions, because sometimes term "irrefutable" is used to denote some statement that is believed to be well proven, and in many cases, the statement is, indeed, well proven.

## Art

### Art versus Science

Product of art, its artistic concept is, in certain sense, antonym of scientific fact.

Certain branches of art not only allow alternative description, but even explicitly indicate, that their concept is just wrong. This helps to distinguish the product of art from the historic documents. While writing drama Рутений и Каюк (In Russian), it was not yet evident, that Mayak factory is responsible for the 2017.09.25.Puff; so, the factory is denoted with identifier Каюк instead of Маяк.

In paintings, is any mirror is shown, it is assumed, that the model looks at reflection of the painter in the mirror. The same refers to the artistic photography: The model, making-up in front of mirror, usually looks at the reflection of camera in the mirror. Not at the reflection of herself. Basing on the laws of reflection of light, this concept can be interpreted as scientific fact.

In the socialistic realism, the obviously wrong concepts of Sovietism are assumed (construction of communism in the USSR during century 20, efficiency of socialistic system of production of goods, etc.).

### Facts in art

Sergei Dovlatov describes the discussion of facts, that took place in the Russiqn club [9].

The English retelling:

Mr. Higgins told us about the tasks of the symposium. The opening part was concluded with the words:
- World history is common for all countries!
- The fact! - loudly agreed Mr. Lemkus.

Mr. Higgins slightly pricked up his ears and added:
- I am convinced that Russia will soon embark on the path of democratization and humanism!
- The fact! - Lemkus reacted as energetically as possible.

Mr. Higgins raised his eyebrows in surprise and said:
- Future Russia seems to me a prosperous free state!
- The fact! - Lemkus said with the same loudness.

Finally Mr. Higgins looked him over and said:
- I respect your point of view, Mr. Lemkus. I only ask you to present your concept more descriptively. Slang is not argumentation, yet..

It took certain efforts from Samsonov, who is fluent in English, to resolve the misunderstanding, explaining meaning of words "fact" and "fucked".

## References

2. https://www.morebooks.de/store/ru/book/Суперфункции/isbn/978-3-659-56202-0
http://www.ils.uec.ac.jp/~dima/BOOK/202.pdf